Consulting, Craig
Consulting, Judy
Newsletters
Publicity
Discussion
Fan Letters
College Course
Contact
Links
Craig's Movie Picks
Craig's Bio
Free Mini-Consultation
Free Query Read
Issue Thirty Six

 HOLLYWOODSCRIPT.COM NEWSLETTER

Welcome to the latest edition of the Hollywoodscript.com Newsletter, which is published by script consultants Craig Kellem, Judy Kellem
(http://www.hollywoodscript.com)

THIS NEWSLETTER IS NEVER SPAM.

You are receiving this newsletter because you expressed an interest in screenwriting by subscribing to this newsletter OR requested a read or a free query letter evaluation from Hollywoodscript.Com(s) Craig Kellem or Judy Kellem.

If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please reply to this E-Mail and put the word "UNSUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.

The purpose of this newsletter is to share information, ideas etc. concerning the fascinating (and elusive) world of screenwriting.

______________

IF WE DON'T ANSWER YOUR EMAIL PLEASE RESEND IT AND PLEASE MENTION SOMETHING
ABOUT WRITING ON THE SUBJECT LINE. WE LOSE SOME MAIL DUE TO SPAM. NORMALLY WE
GET BACK TO EVERYONE!!
-----------------------------

______________
“ OBITUARY” MAKES THE NATIONAL AIRWAVES!

HOLLYWOODSCRIPT.COM’S RECENT CONTEST WINNER, JOANNE WANNAN’S “OBITUARY” AIRED ON THE LIFETIME NETWORK THIS PAST SUNDAY TO VERY HIGH RATINGS. AMAZING AND GRATIFYING HOW FAST IT SOLD AND WAS PRODUCED. IT WAS FUN TO SEE IT IN ALL ITS GLORY. BIG CONGRATS TO JOANNE.


________________

GRAND PRIZE WINNER!
Hi Craig-Thought you should know, I just learned that "Death Is Relative" just won the Grand Prize in the WriteMovies.Com International Screenplay Competition. http://www.writemovies.com/writingcontest.html
It beat out 1000 other scripts from across the planet... I am in shock to say the least. Thanks for all your help in turning that script around, it really paid off. After the sizable cash prize, the folks at the site are going to make a big push by sending the script to all the studios.
Rob Collie

BIG CONGRATS ROB AND THANX FOR THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
______________
CONFESSIONS OF A SCRIPT CONSULTANT PART 2
As we continue on our quest to help make screenwriters achieve their dreams, I’d like to take a step back and reflect on things, as I do from time to time. After all, so much of my life is vested in this and I give it the same kind of care and attention that I give to the other coveted aspects of my daily existence, such as my marriage, children, etc.

Sometimes people ask me if I get impatient or bored with what they project must be a steady stream of faulty material from the non-pro writer side of things. How surprised they would be to know what pleasure it gives me to be able to see real promise in MUCH that I read, and to relish the opportunity to help preserve and value the nuggets of what does work, and also find substantial ways to build on it. And although it’s very pleasing to go all the way with something (and it happens more often than you’d think - “all the way” defined as substantial progress, industry-wise), it’s also very fulfilling to see a writer grow measurably, and cross that line where she/he has finally written a script which can honestly be defined as a professional piece of work.

What a threshold!

Reflecting all this, here are a few moments in time:

*What a pleasure it was to hit the “on” button last Sunday night and see a produced movie on national TV that had floated in here not so long ago. What fun it was rooting for it all the way and being able to compare how it seemed in my head with how it was on the screen. The writer later told me that as she watched it, she couldn’t turn off mouthing the dialogue that still streamed inside. What a unique way to take in a flick!

*Still have my fingers crossed for the guy down in Tennessee who’s written a whopper and now keeps traveling back and forth, “power” meeting with producers who are very seriously running with his worthy script, trying to get it made and actively looking at “A-list talent to package with the script.” It should be noted that this piece of work had the dubious honor of making the Hollywood “black list,” a select list of projects that have not yet been made, but that a consensus of the town believes should be. He keeps getting close and it’s fun to watch it happen.

*Had a client recently who finally wrote the kind of script that he had always dreamed of writing. Funny though, he had no expectations regarding the contest, I could sense this as I know what it’s like having little or no expectations in certain areas. It was great fun to inform him that he had won, and to see him quietly enter a whole new level of a nascent writing career.

*They get away from time to time though. Worked with another writer and, oh my gosh, did we ever get into the zone. Initial script came in thin, a big idea that wasn’t being executed “big” enough. What pleasure it gave me to realize this and to influence the writer in that direction, who, to her credit totally rose to the occasion. Then, in midstream, she disappeared. My thought was that she got so excited with the prospects that she couldn’t stand not getting to the finish line even faster and knew I felt there was much more to do. Hope she makes it, but my experience is that if all this was about impatience, that’s usually a big mistake.

*Still have a terrific project, one that really knocked me out, floating around LA, fully optioned, all systems in place, but still not sold. It amazes me how long it took to get to this stage of the game and how long it can take to make the goal-line. But I must remember that it’s still alive and well and there are people who passionately believe in it.

*Recently worked with a well-known playwright, brilliant characters, incredible dialogue, great humanity, humor and vision. But boy did the STORY need work, and it would be so encouraging to younger writers to realize that even the masters can have trouble with their sense of direction.

And the list goes on:

*Loved working with a gent in Oklahoma who compensated me well whenever I had a funny suggestion for his worthy script, via a healthy, down-home chuckle as he scribbled away. Or the kid in New England who, after sending in a sometimes confusing piece of work (loaded with a plethora of college-age characters running into each other), took like a duck to water when I asked him to create story arcs to make a better linear sense of his various subplots. And now the piece is really beginning to shape up and take form. Or the guy with the “sports script” from Texas who keeps hanging in, crossing the t’s, dotting the i’s, so analogous with his script, whose protagonist is making the same kind of noble effort in his game of choice “against all odds.”

The great subtextual payoff from all this is in dealing with people all over the country, and sometimes all over the world. You get a sense of connectiveness and also a precious reassurance that there are good people out there, and that all is really well in many important (and gracefully quiescent) ways. This is in such stark contrast to all the constant bad news and noise of the media, and sense of endless busyness out there. There’s something reassuring about good people working on their “secret” projects, glowing with good intentions and hope and sharing them with folks like Judy and I, as they chuckle, wince and root for their baby to make the grade. What luck to be entrusted to share their experiences and hopefully contribute in crucial ways .

___________________
MORE CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM! (BITS AND PIECES/SAMPLES OF FEEDBACK WE’VE GIVEN TO OUR WRITERS)

**As discussed, this script definitely shows a kind of raw promise in that there are many bits, moments, parts of scenes, and scenes that work, and also, this area of contemporary, twenty-something angst, conflict, and beingness is very movie-friendly and you seem to know the arena very well. So, I would look at what you’ve written so far as a vibrant SOURCE from which a better-crafted screenplay can be derived.

Make up your mind to employ real selectiveness and economy in the next draft. Part and parcel to this would be to reorient yourself away from a talking heads/conversational style, and instead to create a more cinematic motif where people do things and action occurs around them.

It is urgent that you identify each story arc within the screenplay and then work on their “spines” before writing, making sure that they’re maxed out in terms of telling full and satisfying individual stories, however small some might be. Criteria used here includes - is there a real beginning, middle, and end? Are there surprises? Does it pay off? And are the scenes full and eventful, etc.? A screenplay is a sum of its parts. Therefore, those parts must be scrutinized, tweaked, and balanced before they all come together. (Please re-review my article “Story Story Story,” which can found on our site under “Useful and Important articles.”

These prerequisites will be so important in taking your well-founded creative intentions and sensibilities and giving them form, shape, dimension, purpose, and proportionality. You could compare it to a makeover, wherein someone actually finds the right look, the right weight, the right clothes, etc., and then is truly prepared to go out in the world and do their thing successfully.

**Sharing the protagonist’s role feels awkward, as “tag-team” protagonists are not common, and for good reason (it’s hard enough making ONE protagonist work). If the story is ultimately about both of them, with a shared thematic connection, then both need to be reasonably ubiquitous (or at least well-seeded/planted) throughout most of the script so that we understand, without ambiguity, that we are dealing with a two-person “hero” situation.

**Granted, many films such as Airplane, and various Jim Carrey movies etc, are zany and often over-the-top. But they are also cagily believable in their own way, and this does not happen by accident, as comedy practitioners know how burned they can get just going for the laughs and rationalizing away the need for these other critical tenets of comedy.

**Bulkiness and the lack of a consistent and ubiquitous protagonist makes the script read almost episodically (hunky), as opposed to stories that intertwine and coalesce. I’d make sure that we are kept abreast of what’s happening across the board on a more consistent basis.

**The vista herein needs to be greatly broadened a la a movie like Swingers, where a myriad of twenty-somethings’ delights and agonies are utilized, including career, dating, disillusionment, pressure, hauntings from the past, peer situations, backstories, dreams, etc., etc. I think you get the picture. Can you imagine stocking up on this kind of “creative currency” and then being able to spawn cool and eventful scenes and story arcs, (as you did with the winning scenes I referenced on the phone). In other words, the more meat on the bone, the more you have to work with the better, and, in a character piece such as yours you need lots of challenges, obstacles, and situations to keep things viable, since you don’t have car chases and serial killers to keep the plot moving.

You must reduce this script and marry yourselves with the beauty of economy, as well as to start thinking more cinematically, creating scenes that have movement and also use devices such as stage directions and “layering” to liven things up. Also, please have another look at movies such as Garden State and Lost in Translation for inspiration regarding creating fuller, more eventful scenes that, because of their vitality and multi-facetedness, “write themselves.”

**Screenplay writing is a craft that has many tenets that can take years and years to learn, and even then, it can be very hit and miss. These puppies only look like they’re easy to write. In this case, you need to employ some of these very basic tenets and fundamental measures to get your project “in the tent”:

I’d trim, cut, and truncate this script, a la my article “The Art of Cutting.” I’d also avoid talky, sedentary scenes, instead going for ones where there is a sense of motion, action, more plot, etc., and also employ key stage directions to enhance subtext and to provide a better sense of physicality.

You need to find a way to frame this so it’s not just a diary-like potpourri of a family history. A screenplay needs a sense of a real beginning, middle, and end, context, continuity, a protagonist - the whole nine yards.

You will have to experiment on the right formula for this, but the ballpark could be things we discussed such as making the last story the big one and starting off in it and using it as a “wraparound” for the whole script, meaning that it’s the dominating story that we keep coming back to.

And perhaps your main player in that story can provide a consistent, narrator-like context of it and all the other family stories, which could also lay out as full and ongoing subplots.
In other words, all stories are told in the same fashion across the length and the breadth of the script, but they are dominated by the main story that is complemented and given contextual meaning by these other subplots, which show a certain linkage and commonality with each other.

**The script needs to be tightened and truncated as you tend to milk sequences a bit too much. LESS almost always works better. I urge you to go to the articles section of our site (ie Useful and Important Articles) and read a short piece called “The Art of Cutting” which suggests a gentle method of handling this important issue. I’ve also marked areas on the script that I thought went on too long, but this kind of habit usually requires a philosophical change on the part of all writers who tend to write long-ish, who in my view, need to adopt an actual LIKING for economy.

The other issue is the old one with this script, namely in making it all seem as believable as possible.

In my view, reality is critical and is the real predicate for almost all comedy. As clever as your story is, there are many basic high concept “contrivances” involved which must be offset with a real effort towards making things feel as believable as possible, in and around them.

**The material that you sent me is pretty darn well written: good action, a very respectable sense of the mood and genre, and characterizations that will work even better when these urgently needed basics are implemented.

So I urge you to “lace in” the following exposition:

A timeframe.

A sense of what’s happening in the world, universe, etc.

Why and if this alien is unique (thus a sense of what the stakes are).

More info on your players, such as backstory, hopes, dreams, etc which will help make us understand their situations even better .

So in a nutshell, I would provide us with a reasonable sense of PERSPECTIVE AND CONTEXT ETC AND IN DOING SO TELL A STORY THAT’S IMPORTANT AND EVEN RELEVANT IN MANY WAYS.

**Credibility is a big issue herein. You’re in kind of a no-man’s-land. It’s neither James Bond, nor is it John le Carre . It’s got to be one or the other, and my vote is more le Carre than Bond. You simply need to give everything a kind of reality sniff-test, namely “Could this actually happen in real-life?”

**As discussed, the project continues to be a well-written, well-conceived, well-populated piece of work. As they say in Hollywood, “it’s all there,”- it’s just missing its proper share of conflict, context, jeopardy, and other theatrical prerequisites. It simply too “soft,” especially for a piece which, in my view, is so intrinsically hot.

**So, in my view, the solution should come in the form of the following:

A real protagonist with a clear and present situation that seems impossible to solve, etc., etc. Traditional as this may seem, sometimes tradition’s OK .

A much deeper sense of what happened, what the present “universe” herein is like, supported by juicy and dramatic flashbacks illustrating how we got here.

Part and parcel to this all, this script needs a greater sense of raison d’être, an ultimate thing, truth, goal or whatever, that needs to be achieved and will, in the process, be delightfully burdened by more conflict, angst, jeopardy, obstacles -- the whole nine yards. This includes more weighty , effectively evil and resourceful bad guys.

I can’t emphasize enough the need for this piece to have a context, overview, and focus, that gives us not only the aforementioned elements, but also a keen sense of an original and fascinating arena and perplexing situation...after all, if you close your eyes and imagine such a tenuous lifestyle/predicament etc, your mind can run away with situations, mores, nuances, etc. that push the envelope every which way in how human beings can be inventive, destructive, wonderful, awful, and everything in between, especially when the rules of existence change. Why not, then, take more advantage of this potent canvas and give us something to “write home about.”

**Since we went over it page-by-page I won’t belabor this, except to say that it’s really important to provide a little more prerequisite information so that, sooner rather than later, we have a better sense of who’s who and what’s what. After all, this is a very unusual and eclectic situation, venue, and population, and without a sense of focus and/or cohesion, it’s easy to spend more time trying to figure out what’s happening than on just enjoying the ride.

**So an honest, tangible, linear and dominant thru-line will help a lot in supporting the plethora of unusual things that “surround” it. Not to mention the need to always provide an ample sense of cohesion, context, perspective and connectedness to give this puppy the ease and fluidity that it deserves.

**It’s simply lacking the “normal” tenets of most theatrical productions in terms of way too subtle motivation on the part of the protagonist, a lack of a sense of why one goes in a given direction, etc., etc. I suggest that you work out a PLAN, prior to revision, as to how to upgrade this basic area. I’d go with some kind of outline that, on a beat-by-beat basis, delineates the hopefully ascending story trajectory and the respective motivations, particularly those of your protagonist.

**All good comedy, even that which is directed towards children, is enhanced by a reality base. Broad comedy, without this base, does not have much of a shelf-life, particularly in the long form. This project has a four hundred year-old history, deeply embedded in meaningful hot spots of the human condition. Why not, therefore, broaden things in the setup, and in the characterizations, and be funny and silly to the max, but still include and embrace these other aspects and levels.

**The tone of the piece is inconsistent. My vote is to place this more in the drama/thriller bag, rather than too much tongue in cheek, particularly at the beginning of the script which kind of ‘sets the dial’ for what it is.

**Please cap all characters only when introduced in the narrative. Also “bracketing” (quick little and occasional slugline reminders of where we were last time in a given subplot) will help us keep track of things as well as an occasional “summary” (disguised list built into dialogue of “where we’re at” at any given time).

**Generally speaking, you tend to write more character stuff and what I call “texture” than story/plot. In this script, it feels somewhat disproportionate! With too much texture one can get lost here and there, since story is what usually keeps our noses pointed in the right direction.

**The funniest writers on God’s earth still need a keen sense of reality, relatability, normalcy and even poignancy and drama in their scripts. Is this “rule” ever broken? Sure. But most of the time, the result of these digressions is failure, and often just on a developmental level, since material that’s gratuitously funny and lacks the other needed elements usually ends up on the dust pile. The trick is to create multidimensional situations and amply utilize the honest tragic-comedic human condition as the predicate of things to come.

In other words, reality is very much the comedy writer’s friend.

SCRIPTBLASTER has an incredibly vast data base of producers, agents, managers
and the like. They can zap your coverage or query directly into the hands of
many viable Hollywood producers, agents, managers etc. A unique feature is that
the emails will be generated from your own personal email so industry
professionals will respond directly to you. (http://www.scriptblaster.com)
_______ ___________
If you want to find out more about Hollywoodscript.com and the work we do with
screenwriters and their scripts, please
visit our site at http://www.hollywoodscript.com
Copyright 2006 Hollywoodscript.com LLC , all rights reserved.


[Back to Newsletters]